Comparative Analysis of Ventral Hernia Repair and Transverse Abdominis Release With and Without Panniculectomy: A 4-Year Match-Pair Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Amid rising obesity, concurrent ventral hernia repair and panniculectomy procedures are increasing. Long-term outcomes of transverse abdominis release (TAR) combined with panniculectomy remain understudied. This study compares clinical outcomes and quality of life (QoL) after TAR, with or without panniculectomy. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review from 2016 to 2022 evaluated patients undergoing TAR with and without panniculectomy. Propensity-scored matching was based on age, body mass index, ASA, and ventral hernia working group. Patients with parastomal hernias were excluded. Patient/operative characteristics, postoperative outcomes, and QoL were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty subjects were identified (25 per group) with a median follow-up of 48.8 months (interquartile range, 43-69.7 months). The median age and body mass index were 57 years (47-64 years) and 31.8 kg/m2 (28-36 kg/m2), respectively. The average hernia defect size was 354.5 cm2 ± 188.5 cm2. There were no significant differences in hernia recurrence, emergency visits, readmissions, or reoperations between groups. However, ventral hernia repair with TAR and panniculectomy demonstrated a significant increase in delayed healing (44% vs 4%, P < 0.05) and seromas (24% vs 4%, P < 0.05). Postoperative QoL improved significantly in both groups (P < 0.005) across multiple domains, which continued throughout the 4-year follow-up period. There were no significant differences in QoL among ventral hernia working group, wound class, surgical site occurrences, or surgical site occurrences requiring intervention (P > 0.05). Patients with concurrent panniculectomy demonstrated a significantly greater percentage change in overall scores and appearance scores. CONCLUSIONS: Ventral hernia repair with TAR and panniculectomy can be performed safely with low recurrence and complication rates at long-term follow-up. Despite increased short-term postoperative complications, patients have a significantly greater improvement in disease specific QoL.

Prepectoral versus Submuscular Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Matched-Pair Comparison of Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Implant-based breast reconstruction is the most common reconstructive approach after mastectomy. Prepectoral implants offer advantages over submuscular implants, such as less animation deformity, pain, weakness, and postradiation capsular contracture. However, clinical outcomes after prepectoral reconstruction are debated. The authors performed a matched-cohort analysis of outcomes after prepectoral and submuscular reconstruction at a large academic medical center. METHODS: Patients treated with implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy from January of 2018 through October of 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were propensity score exact matched to control demographic, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative differences. Outcomes assessed included surgical-site occurrences, capsular contracture, and explantation of either expander or implant. Subanalysis was done on infections and secondary reconstructions. RESULTS: A total of 634 breasts were included (prepectoral, 197; submuscular, 437). A total of 292 breasts were matched (146 prepectoral:146 submuscular) and analyzed for clinical outcomes. Prepectoral reconstructions were associated with greater rates of SSI (prepectoral, 15.8%; submuscular, 3.4%; P < 0.001), seroma (prepectoral, 26.0%; submuscular, 10.3%; P < 0.001), and explantation (prepectoral, 23.3%; submuscular, 4.8%; P < 0.001). Subanalysis of infections revealed that prepectoral implants have shorter time to infection, deeper infections, and more Gram-negative infections, and are more often treated surgically (all P < 0.05). There have been no failures of secondary reconstructions after explantation in the entire population at a mean follow-up of 20.1 months. CONCLUSIONS: Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction is associated with higher rates of infection, seroma, and explantation compared with submuscular reconstructions. Infections of prepectoral implants may need different antibiotic management to avoid explantation. Secondary reconstruction after explantation can result in long-term success. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Radiographic Evidence of Dental Complications Following Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis: Inverted-L versus Oblique Osteotomy.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with micrognathia undergoing mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) for functional and aesthetic improvement are at significant risk for dental complications. This study investigates association of two osteotomy patterns-oblique and inverted-L-with risk to developing dentition. METHODS: Our senior orthodontist performed a retrospective review of dental radiographs of patients undergoing MDO with confirmed oblique or inverted-L osteotomies between 2012 and 2022. Images were assessed for evidence of missing, damaged, or displaced teeth, and proportion of affected hemimandibles by injury type and median number of affected teeth per hemimandible were compared between groups using appropriate statistical methodology. RESULTS: Analysis included 44 patients (23 oblique, 21 inverted-L) and 85 hemimandibles (45 and 40). Mean age at surgery was 3.1±4.6 years, and mean time to imaging was 4.9±4.1 years; there was no difference between groups (p=0.23, p=0.34, respectively). Oblique osteotomy was associated with greater odds of missing teeth (OR 13.3, p<0.001), damaged teeth (OR 3.2, p=0.02), and any dental injury (OR 39.9, p<0.001) compared to inverted-L, as well as greater number of missing teeth (ß=0.6, p<0.01), damaged teeth (ß=0.3, p=0.02), and total number of affected teeth (ß=0.9, p<0.001). There was no difference in incidence (p=0.5) or number (p=0.4) of displaced teeth between groups. CONCLUSION: Inverted-L osteotomies were associated with fewer dental complications as compared to oblique osteotomy at all ages studied. While longer-term follow up and prospective data are needed prior to making definitive recommendations, this data is helpful to surgeons as they plan MDO.

Kaban-Pruzansky Grade Predicts Airway Severity in Hemifacial Microsomia.

BACKGROUND: Children born with hemifacial microsomia (HFM) can suffer from airway compromise. There is a paucity of data correlating degree of HFM severity with airway difficulty. This study aims to determine the relationship between degree of micrognathia and airway insufficiency in the HFM population. METHODS: Patient demographics, airway function, Kaban-Pruzansky (KP) grade, and Cormack Lehane (CL) grade were collected and compared with appropriate statistics for HFM patients treated between 2000 and 2022. RESULTS: Seventy patients underwent 365 operations with KP grading as follows: 34% I, 23% IIA, 11% IIB, and 33% grade III. Goldenhar syndrome was present in 40% of patients and 16% had bilateral disease. KP grade (p<0.001) predicted mean number of airway-affecting procedures undergone and difficult airway status (p<0.001), with 75% of difficult airways in KP III patients. There was no association of airway compromise with Goldenhar syndrome, laterality, or age (p>0.05). Most CL grades were I (61%) or IIA (13%), with fewer IIB, III, and IV (4-7%). KP grade predicted CL grade (p<0.001), with 71% of grade IV views and 64% of grade III views seen in KP III patients. CONCLUSIONS: Kaban-Pruzansky grade correlated with airway severity in HFM. Patients do not appear to outgrow their CL grade, as previously hypothesized, suggesting that KP III patients remain at increased risk for airway insufficiency into the teen years. Given the potential significant morbidity associated with airway compromise, proper identification and preparation for challenging airway is a critical part of caring for patients with HFM.